Thermoelasticity
Thermoelasticity describes the coupled dependence of the elastic response of a solid on pressure, temperature, and strain. At a fixed thermodynamic state, linear elasticity relates an infinitesimal stress increment to an infinitesimal strain increment. Thermoelasticity adds the question of how the corresponding elastic coefficients evolve as the reference state itself changes.
A complete treatment must be thermodynamically consistent: the equation of state, thermal expansion, heat capacities, elastic constants, and acoustic velocities should be obtained from derivatives of the same thermodynamic potential. The formulation developed by L. Stixrude and C. Lithgow-Bertelloni provides a particularly useful framework because it generalizes the fundamental thermodynamic relation to anisotropic strain and combines Eulerian finite-strain elasticity with quasi-harmonic lattice thermodynamics [1].
Quantas currently implements the quasi-static approximation (QSA) using a cold Eulerian finite-strain model for the elastic coefficients. The complete thermoelastic framework is introduced first; the approximation used by Quantas is then identified explicitly.
Thermodynamic foundation
For hydrostatic thermodynamics, the Gibbs and Helmholtz free energies are related by the Legendre transformation
A crystal can support deviatoric stress, so pressure and volume must be replaced by tensorial stress and strain variables. The stress tensor can be written as
where \(P\) is the hydrostatic pressure and \(\tau_{ij}\) is the deviatoric stress.
Thermodynamic properties follow from derivatives of a potential expressed in its natural variables. In particular, the isothermal compliance tensor is obtained from the stress derivatives of the Gibbs free energy,
and the stiffness tensor is its inverse,
This construction places elasticity on the same thermodynamic footing as entropy, volume, heat capacity, bulk modulus, and thermal expansion.
Elastic coefficients under hydrostatic pre-stress
At finite pressure, the second derivative of the Helmholtz free energy is not, by itself, the incremental stress–strain coefficient governing wave propagation or mechanical response around the pre-stressed state. For an Eulerian strain increment \(S_{ij}\), the relevant Wallace stress–strain coefficients are [2] [3]
with
The pressure term is therefore part of the thermodynamic definition of the finite-pressure stress–strain coefficients. This distinction matters when elastic tensors are used for stability analysis or acoustic-wave propagation.
Static and vibrational parts of the free energy
Stixrude and Lithgow-Bertelloni write the Helmholtz free energy as the sum of a reference value, a cold compression term, and a quasi-harmonic vibrational term,
Here \(E_{ij}\) is the Eulerian finite-strain tensor. The cold part is expanded as a power series in strain, while the quasi-harmonic part contains the vibrational free energy with phonon frequencies that depend on strain. This decomposition makes the origin of the elastic response explicit:
The first contribution describes the static response of the electronic ground state to compression or expansion. The second contains the explicit vibrational response to strain.
Eulerian finite strain
For an isotropically compressed reference state,
where the scalar Eulerian finite strain is
This convention gives \(f=0\) at the reference volume, positive strain on compression, and negative strain on expansion.
Eulerian finite strain is especially useful at high pressure because the resulting series generally converges more rapidly than a direct expansion in volume or a Lagrangian-strain expansion. In the benchmark examined by Stixrude and Lithgow-Bertelloni for MgSiO3 perovskite, the third-order Eulerian expression reproduced first-principles bulk and shear moduli much more accurately than the corresponding Lagrangian expression. The comparison also showed that the quadratic term in \(f\) can be material at large compression; omitting it changed the predicted shear modulus by several percent in that example.
Cold finite-strain elastic coefficients
Let
\(V_0\) be the reference volume;
\(K_0\) be the reference isothermal bulk modulus;
\(K'_0=(\partial K/\partial P)_0\);
\(C^0_{IJ}\) be one reference Wallace stiffness component;
\(C'^0_{IJ}=(\partial C_{IJ}/\partial P)_0\);
\(\Delta_{IJ}\) be the corresponding Voigt component of \(\delta^{ij}_{kl}\).
The thermodynamically consistent third-order Eulerian finite-strain expression for the cold stiffness component is
The expression has several useful properties:
it recovers \(C^0_{IJ}\) exactly at \(f=0\);
its initial pressure dependence is controlled by \(C'^0_{IJ}\);
all tensor components share the same reference equation-of-state parameters;
the hydrostatic pre-stress tensor enters the quadratic coefficient;
truncating after the linear term gives the second-order form, while retaining \(f^2\) gives the third-order form used for the thermodynamically consistent cold expansion.
The order refers to the truncation of the underlying free-energy expansion. Because elastic constants are strain derivatives, a third-order finite-strain model for the moduli contains a quadratic term in \(f\).
Explicit quasi-harmonic elastic contribution
In the complete quasi-harmonic treatment, vibrational frequencies depend not only on volume but on the full strain tensor. Their strain sensitivity is expressed through the generalized Grüneisen tensor
and its strain derivative
Under the Grüneisen approximations used in the finite-strain formulation, the explicit vibrational correction to the elastic tensor has the form
This equation shows why a full thermoelastic QHA calculation is more demanding than an ordinary volume QHA calculation. It requires derivatives of the phonon frequencies with respect to independent strains, not only their variation along a hydrostatic volume path.
The quasi-static approximation
The quasi-static approximation, as used in practical quasi-harmonic thermoelastic workflows [4], neglects the explicit vibrational strain contribution \(\Delta c^{\mathrm q}_{ijkl}\). Temperature still changes the elastic tensor, but only indirectly, because thermal vibrations alter the QHA equilibrium volume. The isothermal tensor is therefore approximated as
This approximation retains two distinct pieces of information:
a static finite-strain relation \(C^{\mathrm c}_{IJ}(V)\);
a quasi-harmonic equilibrium-volume surface \(V(P,T)\).
The QHA volume may include zero-point and thermal vibrational effects on the equilibrium structure. What is omitted is their explicit anisotropic strain derivative in the elastic tensor.
The QSA is consequently more informative than applying an arbitrary linear temperature correction to each elastic coefficient. Pressure and temperature remain coupled through one physical state variable, the equilibrium volume, and the cold elastic coefficients retain the finite-strain structure required by the reference equation of state. However, the approximation cannot capture materials for which explicit vibrational shear-strain coupling is large.
Isothermal and adiabatic elastic tensors
The cold finite-strain reconstruction gives an isothermal stiffness tensor. Many acoustic and seismic measurements are closer to adiabatic conditions. A thermodynamic conversion [5] [6] can be written in Voigt notation as
where \(\alpha_K\) is the Voigt representation of the thermal-expansion tensor. The correction is positive semidefinite when \(T\), \(V\), and \(C_V\) are positive, so adiabatic stiffness is not smaller than the corresponding isothermal stiffness in the associated quadratic form.
This conversion does not restore the explicit vibrational strain derivatives omitted by the QSA. It converts the thermodynamic boundary condition of an already reconstructed tensor from isothermal to adiabatic.
Approximation implemented by Quantas
The present Quantas thermoelastic workflow implements the following scientific model:
determine a common cold reference \(V_0\), \(K_0\), and \(K'_0\) from the static electronic energy–volume relation;
determine \(C^0_{IJ}\) and \(C'^0_{IJ}\) from static elastic tensors sampled at several hydrostatic volumes;
represent every independent stiffness component with the second- or third-order Eulerian cold finite-strain expression;
evaluate that relation at the QHA equilibrium volume \(V_{\mathrm{QHA}}(P,T)\);
optionally convert the reconstructed isothermal tensor to the adiabatic tensor using QHA heat capacity and thermal expansion.
Quantas does not presently evaluate the generalized Grüneisen tensor \(\gamma_{ij}\), its strain derivative \(\eta_{ijkl}\), or the explicit quasi-harmonic elastic contribution. The result is therefore a quasi-static thermoelastic tensor, not a complete strain-dependent QHA elastic tensor.
Scientific scope and limitations
The QSA is most defensible when:
the static elastic-volume relation is smooth and well constrained;
the QHA equilibrium state remains within, or close to, the calibrated volume interval;
thermal evolution is dominated by expansion along the hydrostatic volume path;
explicit vibrational shear-strain coupling is modest;
the phase remains mechanically and thermodynamically meaningful over the investigated domain.
The approximation does not describe intrinsic anharmonicity, phonon lifetimes, magnetic or electronic thermal excitations, phase transformations, or explicit strain derivatives of the phonon spectrum. Agreement between a QSA result and experiment is therefore material- and state-dependent and should be evaluated rather than assumed.
The Eulerian finite-strain formulation is also a truncated series. Its third-order form is generally preferable over a broad compression interval, but higher-order behavior may become important for some materials or at very large strain. Extrapolation outside the sampled elastic-volume and QHA domains must be treated as a scientific prediction with correspondingly greater uncertainty.
For operational details, input requirements, diagnostics, and supported analyses, see Thermoelasticity: implementation and workflow.